Ok guys I was super confused about refresh rates considering your eyes only see about 24 to 30 frames per second how could 60hz be any advantage?
Well after some more research and talking to people I finally figured it out and though I would share what I didn't know or understand. With 30hz your image is captured processed and displayed this takes time a new image is made every 3.33 1/100s of a second so very best case scenario would be that you are seeing an event that took place over 3 1/100s of a second ago. On a fast moving target that means you could have a miss cause the animal is no longer in the spot you saw it.
60hz is only 1.6 1/100s of a second behind reality. So your target has moved only haf the distance. So it appears that it's not just about how smooth the image looks but more about how close to real time you see the image.
Comment and observations from those of you who have shot both?
Well after some more research and talking to people I finally figured it out and though I would share what I didn't know or understand. With 30hz your image is captured processed and displayed this takes time a new image is made every 3.33 1/100s of a second so very best case scenario would be that you are seeing an event that took place over 3 1/100s of a second ago. On a fast moving target that means you could have a miss cause the animal is no longer in the spot you saw it.
60hz is only 1.6 1/100s of a second behind reality. So your target has moved only haf the distance. So it appears that it's not just about how smooth the image looks but more about how close to real time you see the image.
Comment and observations from those of you who have shot both?