Liberals ramping up attack against guns and free speech.

[RattlesnakeDan]

Until somebody gets the ACLU involves and sues places such as YouTube and Lone Star Boars, I don't see this changing.

Dan, you said I danced around the issues. Are you not dancing around the fact that THIS forum uses censorship, or is this not a problem for you because you are not affected? I am just curious about this spiritual battle and how spiritual it really is. We are not allowed to mention particular product names or vendors on this forum, a public forum, not run by a liberal, but by a conservative. Type in names like ************** and you get asterisks. You don't seem the least little bit bothered by this. Why? It is censorship, plain and simple, by an owner of a privately owned, public online forum. I see where numerous other online forums do not allow for the discussions of certain topics. Would that also quality as censorship? You bet. So you can't start a thread and talk about the new car stereo system you installed on your Jeep Cherokee on The Firing Line, a conservative 2nd amendment discussion forum. You can't use foul language, there or discuss religion. These are all clearly forms of censorship on a privately held public forum. Where is your spiritual battle? Where are your fruits?

You are not significant enough for their to be a personal battle between us. But your opening sentence tells all. The ACLU is one step below terrorists in their belief system. They are the most godless bunch of liberals fighting against anything that is Christian. Chop up a baby human with a scissors but jail someone for fighting dogs. Fools. As for your statement about not being offended by what is banned on this site is so far off truth, you talk alot but are inaccurate with your rambling. Things not allowed here are vulgarity, foolish posts designed to embarrass others etc.. banning things that are bad and accepting things that are good. The opposite of liberalism who accept what is wrong and ban what is truth and right. Has nothing to do with business names which apparently bothers you but does not affect most others here. Again, a spiritual battle that some will never understand because of the refusal to know God and understand even the simplest things of His nature.

 

[der Teufel]

Banning vulgarity, embarrassing posts, etc. is still censorship. It happens to be censorship with which I generally agree, but it's censorship all the same.
As for the ACLU, they take on a lot of unpopular causes because they defend things like vulgarity. But they do a lot of good work forcing people and government to adhere to the laws of the land.
The real topic here is YouTube. YouTube is certainly within their rights to limit viewership or delete posts that they deem offensive, even if I don't find it offensive myself. I don't have to like it, but I'm not in charge of YouTube so my options are limited. Meanwhile, lets go kill some hogs!

And post videos while we can!

 

[Wildfowler]

OH NO!! WHERE WILL GO FOR MY PORN IF THEY DO THAT? (lol, joke, joke)

I don’t think porn hub was going to get out of the porno business I think they just had the infrastructure available to also become a YouTube competitor.

But I’ve not heard anymore about this.

 

[RattlesnakeDan]

The real topic here is YouTube. YouTube is certainly within their rights to limit viewership or delete posts that they deem offensive, even if I don't find it offensive myself.

My last post on this foolishness. Once again, what is it that they are deeming unfit for the "masses" Come on...you can do it. Conservatism, Christianity, and truth.

 

[Brian Shaffer]

It is an interesting thing, this sense of entitlement, be it to post on somebody else's website or to hunt somebody else's land. Those of us who are not owners are only guests on those locations, subject to the rules of those locations imposed by the owners and within the law. Claiming rights beyond a guest status seems to be based in very liberal views, even if poorly sugar coated with claims to the contrary.